<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments on the New York Times&#8217; Comments System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanstray.com/comments-on-the-new-york-times-comments-system/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanstray.com/comments-on-the-new-york-times-comments-system</link>
	<description>Information, Culture, and Belief</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstray.com/comments-on-the-new-york-times-comments-system/comment-page-1#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstray.com/?p=1382#comment-668</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really dug into the comments on NYT but if they are anything like the dismal hatefest of comments on SFGate, then I don&#039;t blame NYT for not paying attention to them and promoting email for error correction. Sometimes it&#039;s better to encourage more hoops as you get less tripe.

As for not all articles having open comments, I can see this is relevant too. Not everything small piece of news needs to be a discussion. And since they are in the business of timely news shutting it down after a bit also makes sense.

Now having thumbs up/down votes for relevent comments and having nested comments would likely improve the system—sfgate needs this. Nested comments tend to limit flame wars to a small nested area rather than have the entire comment thread get hosed by it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really dug into the comments on NYT but if they are anything like the dismal hatefest of comments on SFGate, then I don&#8217;t blame NYT for not paying attention to them and promoting email for error correction. Sometimes it&#8217;s better to encourage more hoops as you get less tripe.</p>
<p>As for not all articles having open comments, I can see this is relevant too. Not everything small piece of news needs to be a discussion. And since they are in the business of timely news shutting it down after a bit also makes sense.</p>
<p>Now having thumbs up/down votes for relevent comments and having nested comments would likely improve the system—sfgate needs this. Nested comments tend to limit flame wars to a small nested area rather than have the entire comment thread get hosed by it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

