<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t throw that out! Editing like it&#8217;s paper destroys journalistic value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanstray.com/dont-throw-that-out/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanstray.com/dont-throw-that-out</link>
	<description>Information, Culture, and Belief</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Review: Gizmodo and the shield law, making sense of social data, and the WSJ’s local push &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstray.com/dont-throw-that-out/comment-page-1#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: Gizmodo and the shield law, making sense of social data, and the WSJ’s local push &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstray.com/?p=1850#comment-853</guid>
		<description>[...] main thrust but took issue with the points he made to get there. Meanwhile, Jonathan Stray argued that “the web is more amenable to journalism of different levels of quality and completeness” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] main thrust but took issue with the points he made to get there. Meanwhile, Jonathan Stray argued that “the web is more amenable to journalism of different levels of quality and completeness” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Review: Gizmodo and the shield law, making sense of social data, and the WSJ&#8217;s local push » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstray.com/dont-throw-that-out/comment-page-1#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: Gizmodo and the shield law, making sense of social data, and the WSJ&#8217;s local push » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstray.com/?p=1850#comment-802</guid>
		<description>[...] main thrust but took issue with the points he made to get there. Meanwhile, Jonathan Stray argued that &#8220;the web is more amenable to journalism of different levels of quality and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] main thrust but took issue with the points he made to get there. Meanwhile, Jonathan Stray argued that &#8220;the web is more amenable to journalism of different levels of quality and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apparently Stones Are for Drinking Now [Three Best Things 4/19/10 - 4/25/10] » The ENGINE Blog » ENGINE Industries: Atlanta, Georgia Web Design</title>
		<link>http://jonathanstray.com/dont-throw-that-out/comment-page-1#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Apparently Stones Are for Drinking Now [Three Best Things 4/19/10 - 4/25/10] » The ENGINE Blog » ENGINE Industries: Atlanta, Georgia Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanstray.com/?p=1850#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] Now [Three Best Things 4/19/10 - 4/25/10]  Posted by Jason on Sun, 04/25/2010 - 11:43pm  Thing: Don’t throw that out! Editing like it’s paper destroys journalistic value by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now [Three Best Things 4/19/10 - 4/25/10]  Posted by Jason on Sun, 04/25/2010 &#8211; 11:43pm  Thing: Don’t throw that out! Editing like it’s paper destroys journalistic value by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

